Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 15;2016(12):CD002830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002830.pub3

Van Leeuwen 1977.

Methods Allocation: randomly assigned ‐ participants listed in chronological order assigned individually numbered vials.
Blinding: double ‐ no further details.
Design: double‐blind placebo‐controlled study.
Duration: 30 minutes.
Settings: not clear.
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia (N = 20); mania/manic depression (N = 9), confusional state (N = 2), miscellaneous (N = 3), not recorded (N = 7).
N = 41.
Age: range 14 to 78 years, median 33.5 years.
Sex: female 18, male 23.
History: acutely agitated, about 50% already taking maintenance psychotropic drugs, about 20% already received inadequate treatment for agitation.
Excluded: no exclusions mentioned.
Interventions 1. Droperidol 10 mg IV. N = 19.
2. Placebo 10 mg IV. N = 22.
Outcomes Global state: needing additional injection, time to control (no measure/scale given).
Adverse effects.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "The vials containing this solution were individually numbered and their content (droperidol or placebo) was randomly assigned".
Response: probably randomised.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "On entering the trial, the patients were chronologically numbered and this number indicated the vial which was to be used".
Response: unclear method of concealment.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "the study was strictly double blinded..."
Response: participants and personnel were probably blind to the intervention.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No mention of blinding of outcome assessment.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "breaking the code revealed that 19 patients had been treated with droperidol and 22 patients with placebo".
Response: all participants who were initially included were analysed.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes were reported.

BPRS: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; ECG: electrocardiogram; ED: emergency department; EPS: extrapyramidal adverse effects; IM: intramuscular; IV: intravenous; SAT: Social Attribution Task.