Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 2;2016(12):CD011308. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011308.pub2

Uy 2005.

Methods RCT. Only 1 eye per participant was entered in the study.
Participants Country: the Philippines
Number of participants randomised: 22
Number of eyes randomised: 22
Number (%) of participants followed up: 100%
Average age: 45 years
% female: 41%
Inclusion criteria: participants with primary pterygium
Exclusion criteria: participants with ocular pathology other than error of refraction, with a history of previous ocular surgery or trauma, narrow occludable angles, ocular hypertension, physiologic or glaucomatous optic disc cupping, a family history of glaucoma, or known hypersensitivity to any component of fibrin glue
Interventions Intervention: fibrin glue fixation of conjunctival autograft (n = 11)
Comparator: suture fixation of conjunctival autograft (n = 11)
Outcomes Graft success, recurrence rate, operating time, participant comfort
List outcomes: recurrence rate, surgical time, complications rate and postoperative participant discomfort
Follow‐up: 2 months. Due to the short follow‐up we did not take the recurrence outcome into account, we considered just operating time and complication rate.
Notes Funding source: not reported
Conflict of interest: not reported
Date study conducted: June‐August 2001
Trial registration number: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk The participant was then randomly assigned by coin toss
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk The trial was described as randomised, but methods used for allocation sequence generation not described
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Masking probably of limited importance for the specified outcomes, because the risk of ascertainment bias was limited, but could have affected other outcomes
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All participants completed the 2‐month follow‐up period
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Protocol not obtained; all outcomes stated in methods reported