Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;2016(12):CD002007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002007.pub4

Smith 1999.

Methods Double‐blind, computer‐generated randomisation, symptomatic regimen. Parallel trial.
Participants 37 male, 39 female, mean age 16.3 years.
 111 participants enrolled, 35 withdrawn. 76 participants in total aged 6 ‐ 18 years. PsA colonised.
Group 1 (azlocillin): 33 participants (19 male) mean (SD) age 16.07 (7.4) years
 Group 2 (azlocillin & tobramycin): 43 participants (18 male) mean (SD) age 16.53 (6.9) years
Interventions Azlocillin 450 mg/kg/day, 4‐hourly plus placebo vs azlocillin plus tobramycin 240 mg/m2/day, 6‐hourly, 14 days course.
Outcomes Lung function, time to next admission, symptom scores, adverse events, bacteriology, inflammatory markers, resistant strains.
Notes No data for symptom scores.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated randomisation balance by FVC and center.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Code generated by research pharmacist at the core center.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants and clinicians blinded, serum concentrations monitored by unblinded 3rd party (research pharmacist).
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 35 participants withdrawn (21 from azlocillin group), reasons given in a table.

CBC: complete blood count
 CXR: chest x‐ray
 ITT: intention‐to‐treat
 PsA: Pseudomonas aeruginosa