Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 20;2016(12):CD003091. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003091.pub4

Hewlett 1996.

Methods 2‐arm RCT undertaken in the UK
Participants People undergoing spinal, orthopaedic or abdominal surgery; in total 77 participants were randomised.
Exclusion criteria: people admitted to hospital for minimally‐invasive surgical techniques
Interventions Group A (n = 39): absorbent dressing (Mepore, Mölnlycke Health Care)
 Group B (n = 37): film dressing (Opsite, Smith & Nephew)
 Manufacturers' instructions were followed when applying and removing dressings (no further details provided). Treatment was for a maximum of 10 days.
Outcomes Primary outcome: not reported.
Secondary outcomes: cost (dressing cost to complete healing)
Notes Trial outcome data: see Table 12
Follow‐up: unclear. Trial information retrieved from a poster report only. Infection not reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided in poster report.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided in poster report.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information provided in poster report.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information provided in poster report.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No information provided in poster report.
Other bias Unclear risk No information provided in poster report.