Hewlett 1996.
Methods | 2‐arm RCT undertaken in the UK | |
Participants | People undergoing spinal, orthopaedic or abdominal surgery; in total 77 participants were randomised. Exclusion criteria: people admitted to hospital for minimally‐invasive surgical techniques |
|
Interventions | Group A (n = 39): absorbent dressing (Mepore, Mölnlycke Health Care) Group B (n = 37): film dressing (Opsite, Smith & Nephew) Manufacturers' instructions were followed when applying and removing dressings (no further details provided). Treatment was for a maximum of 10 days. | |
Outcomes | Primary outcome: not reported. Secondary outcomes: cost (dressing cost to complete healing) |
|
Notes | Trial outcome data: see Table 12 Follow‐up: unclear. Trial information retrieved from a poster report only. Infection not reported. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided in poster report. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided in poster report. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided in poster report. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided in poster report. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided in poster report. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No information provided in poster report. |