Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 17;2017(2):CD003225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003225.pub3
Methods D: parallel C: unclear B: double WD: 7/52 J: 1‐1‐0 DU: 3w/17w/6w
Participants N: 52/45 D: all migraine without aura C: IHS F: 91% A: 17‐48 years DU: not reported S: outpatient department of a university hospital in Brazil
Interventions P: 60 mg C1: Flunarizine 10 mg C2: Propranolol + flunarizine
Outcomes R: 15/15 vs. 14/15 vs. 14/15 (global assessment at least 'good') F: 1.3 vs. 1.2 vs. 1.1 attacks/20 days (no variance data) AU: not reported HI: 23.4 vs. 18.7 vs. 14.4 AEs: 2/15 vs. 3/15 vs. 4/15 Dropouts‐AEs: 0 vs. 0 vs. 0 (number of patients randomized to groups not fully clear) V: 0 vs. C1, (‐) vs. C2
Notes Small groups, low propranolol dose
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear