Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 17;2017(2):CD003225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003225.pub3
Methods D: parallel C: adequate B: double WD: 144/810 J: 2‐2‐1 DU: 4w/16w/‐
Participants N: 810/783 (in intent‐to‐treat analysis, 808 in safety analysis) D: 72% migraine without aura C: IHS F: 81% A: 17‐66 years DU: 0.8 to 57 years S: 130 centres in 8 countries
Interventions P: 160 mg (slow‐release) C1: Flunarizine 10 mg C2: Flunarizine 5 mg
Outcomes R: 125/258 vs. 141/264 vs. 118/259 F: 1.7 (sd 1.6) vs. 1.6 (1.6) vs. 1.8 (1.2) AU: 0.9 vs. 1.1 vs. 1.1 migraine attacks treated symptomatically AEs: 88/270 vs. 88/275 vs. 88/263 Dropouts‐AEs: 18/270 vs. 19/275 vs. 21/263 V: 0 vs. C1, 0 vs. C2
Notes Excellent, large, multicentre study Standard deviations for frequency calculated from reported 95% CIs
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate