Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 17;2017(2):CD003225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003225.pub3
Methods D: crossover C: unclear B: double WD: 5/29 J: 1‐1‐0 DU: 4w/2x8w (4w)/‐
Participants N: 29/24 D: 4 migraine with, 25 without aura C: unclear F: 86% A: 24‐47 years DU: 4‐40 years S: private practice, Finland
Interventions P: 160 mg C: Femoxetine 400 mg
Outcomes R: 3/11 vs. 1/11 (1st period; no pooled data) F: 1st period: 5.00 (sem 0.71) vs. 6.81 (1.12); pooled: 4.67 (sem 0.64) vs. 6.16 (0.82) AU: propranolol better HI: propranolol significantly better AEs: more side effects with propranolol Dropouts‐AEs: 3/29 vs. 0/29 V: (+)
Notes Responder data presented only for separate phases; frequency data reported for separate phases and for both phases pooled
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear