Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 17;2017(2):CD003225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003225.pub3
Methods D: parallel C: unclear B: double WD: 1/28 J: 1‐1‐1 DU: 4‐17w/24w/‐
Participants N: 28/27 D: 2 migraine with, 26 without aura C: Ad Hoc F: 79% A: 17‐61 years DU: 2‐45 years S: unclear, Sweden
Interventions P: 80‐160 ng C: Nadolol 40‐160 mg
Outcomes R: 8/14 vs. 5/13 F: reduction from 3.6 to 1.9 vs. 5.6 to 2.7 (sd not reported) AU: reduction from 11.5 to 4.1 vs. 17.1 to 9.2 HI: not reported AEs: 5/14 vs. 6/13 Dropouts‐AEs: 0/15 vs. 1/13 V: 0
Notes Small, rigorous trial with relevant baseline imbalances
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear