Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 17;2017(2):CD003225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003225.pub3
Methods D: parallel C: unclear B: double WD: 14/55, additional 19 patients dropped out in post‐randomisation baseline J: 1‐2‐1 DU: 4w/12w/‐
Participants N: 74/41 D: 8 migraine with, 61 without, 5 both C: IHS F: 76% A: mean 37 years DU: mean 17 years S: muliple centers in France
Interventions P: 160 mg (long‐acting) C: Placebo
Outcomes R: not reported F: 3.15 (sem 0.77) vs. 6.4 (1.70) AU: not reported HI: not reported AEs: similar in both groups Dropouts‐AEs: 0/40 vs. 1/34 V: +
Notes Uncommon design with randomisation before baseline High dropout rate Intent‐to‐treat analysis unclear No placebo effect
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear