Comparison 2. Overall perioperative and postoperative complications.
Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Seldinger (subclavian & IJ) versus venous cutdown (cephalic vein) ITT | 7 | 1006 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.16 [0.76, 1.75] |
2 Seldinger (subclavian vein) versus venous cutdown (cephalic vein) ITT | 5 | 672 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.28 [0.78, 2.10] |
3 Seldinger (IJ vein) versus venous cutdown (cephalic vein) ITT | 2 | 367 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.72 [0.40, 1.31] |
4 Seldinger (subclavian & IJ) versus venous cutdown (cephalic vein). On‐treatment analysis | 7 | 938 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.93 [0.62, 1.40] |
5 Seldinger (subclavian vein) versus venous cutdown (cephalic vein). On‐treatment analysis | 5 | 618 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.06 [0.66, 1.72] |
6 Seldinger (IJ vein) versus venous cutdown (cephalic vein). On‐treatment analysis | 2 | 332 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.67 [0.37, 1.23] |