Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;2017(3):CD001007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001007.pub3

Comparison 1. Group‐format behavioural programmes vs other format.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Smoking cessation. Group programme vs self‐help programme 13 4395 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.88 [1.52, 2.33]
1.1 Group vs self‐help (same programme content) 8 2411 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.37 [1.76, 3.20]
1.2 Group vs self‐help (different programmes) 5 1984 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.42 [1.04, 1.94]
2 Smoking cessation. Group programme vs brief support 16 7601 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.25 [1.07, 1.46]
2.1 Physician, nurse, or pharmacist advice 14 7286 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.22 [1.03, 1.43]
2.2 Health Education 2 315 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.81 [0.94, 3.46]
3 Smoking cessation. Group plus pharmacotherapy vs pharmacotherapy alone 5 1523 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.93, 1.33]
4 Smoking cessation. Group programme vs individual therapy 6 980 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.76, 1.28]
4.1 Group vs individual (similar intensity & content) 4 539 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.68, 1.81]
4.2 Group vs individual (different intensity/content) 2 441 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.94 [0.69, 1.28]
5 Smoking cessation. Group vs 'no intervention' controls 9 1098 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.60 [1.80, 3.76]