Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;2017(3):CD001007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001007.pub3

Cottraux 1983.

Methods Study design: Randomized controlled trial
Country: France
 Recruitment: Community volunteers
 Group size: 15
Participants 558 (418 in arms of interest) community volunteers; 24% women, av. cpd 31
 Therapists; 2 per group, qualifications not described
Interventions 1. Behaviour therapy. Includes discussion, training in relaxation. 3 x 3‐hr sessions over 2 wks. Relaxation and stress‐desensitization audiotape for daily use
 2. Acupuncture (not included in MA)
 3. Placebo ‐ lactose capsules for 2 wks. Met 2 x 10‐min with a doctor
 4. 1‐yr waiting‐list control.
Outcomes Abstinence at 12 m
 Validation: none. Assessor blind to treatment condition
Notes Although 3 described by authors as placebo the 2 meetings with a doctor make it more comparable with an advice intervention, so 1 vs 3 used in comparison 1.3.1 and 1 vs 4 in comparison 1.5
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomized, stratified by presence of another smoker in household, method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No validation and some participants were on a waiting‐list control
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 5% lost to follow‐up, included in ITT analysis