Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;2017(3):CD001007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001007.pub3

DePaul 1987.

Methods Study design: Cluster‐randomized controlled trial
Country: USA
 Recruitment: Employees at 43 worksites, recruited prior to a 3‐wk television smoking cessation programme
Participants 233 smokers in group discussion worksites, 192 in non‐group worksites; 72% women, av. age 43, av. cpd 30
 Groups led by employee with 3 hrs training
Interventions All participants were given S‐H manuals by company co‐ordinators and instructed to view the televised segments
 1. Twice‐weekly 45‐min group meetings for 3 wks
 2. S‐H alone
Outcomes Abstinence at 12 m (multiple PPA)
 No validation
Notes Percentage quit rates estimated from graphs and denominator assumed to be numbers followed‐up
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Cluster‐randomization by worksite, matched for size. 3 worksites did not enter allocated condition but excluding them did not alter findings
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No validation of abstinence
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 8% lost to follow‐up in each group