Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;2017(3):CD001007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001007.pub3

Leung 1991.

Methods Study design: Randomized controlled trial
Country: Hong Kong
 Recruitment: Community volunteers
Participants 95 (63 in relevant arms); 26% women, av. age ˜37, av. cpd ˜26
Interventions 1. Behavioural programme including self‐monitoring, management techniques, coping skills. 10 x 1½‐hr sessions over 2 wks
 2. Auricular acupuncture. Same no. of sessions. Not used in review
 3. Waiting‐list control
Outcomes Abstinence (not defined) at 6 m
 Validation by cohabitant and work colleague report
Notes 1 vs 3, comparison 1.5
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomized, method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No biochemical validation, waiting‐list control
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 9 people lost to follow‐up re‐included in analyses for MA