Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 23;2017(3):CD003347. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003347.pub3

Comparison 3.

Samarium dose‐comparison (data as published)

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pain relief 1 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Complete relief (100%) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Complete/partial relief (50%‐100%) 1 103 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.59, 1.14]
1.3 Any amount of relief (1%‐100%) 1 103 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.74, 1.24]
2 Change in pain 1 103 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.73 [1.96, 3.50]
3 Analgesia consumption 1 102 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.0 [‐6.44, 4.44]
4 Fracture 1 114 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.07 [0.23, 5.09]
5 Compression of spinal cord 2 193 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.79 [0.54, 5.92]
6 Pain flares 2 185 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.17 [0.47, 2.89]
7 Leucocytopenia III‐IV 2 178 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.53 [0.12, 2.30]
8 Thrombocytopenia III‐IV 2 178 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.31, 2.01]
9 Anemia III‐IV 1 71 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.46 [0.26, 8.21]
10 Death 2 184 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.27 [0.63, 2.59]