Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 24;2013(6):CD007281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007281.pub2

Comparison 5. Photodynamic therapy versus cryotherapy.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number of lesions that cleared after first cycle of treatment 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 MAL‐PDT versus cryotherapy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 ALA‐PDT versus cryotherapy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Recurrence at 12 months 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 MAL‐PDT versus cryotherapy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Number of lesions that cleared after second treatment cycle 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 MAL‐PDT versus cryotherapy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 ALA‐PDT versus cryotherapy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Number of participants with a good cosmetic outcome (12 months) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4.1 MAL‐PDT versus cryotherapy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Number of lesions treated where pain is reported 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.1 MAL‐PDT versus cryotherapy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.2 ALA‐PDT versus cryotherapy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6 Number of adverse events > = 1 in participants 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.1 MAL‐PDT versus cryotherapy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]