Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 24;2013(6):CD007281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007281.pub2

Comparison 7. Cryotherapy versus 5‐FU.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number of lesions that cleared after first cycle of treatment 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Recurrence at 12 months 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Number of lesions that cleared after second cycle of treatment 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4 Number of participants with a good/excellent cosmetic outcome 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Number of participants treated reporting pain 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 Number of adverse events > = 1 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only