Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;2017(3):CD011639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011639.pub2

Pageaux 2004.

Methods Randomised clinical trial
Participants Country: France
 Number randomised: 174
 Postrandomisation dropouts: 0 (0%)
 Revised sample size: 174
 Average age: 52 years
 Females: 50 (28.7%)
 Primary transplantation: 174 (100%)
 Retransplantation: 0 (0%)
 HCV: 26 (14.9%)
 HBV: 12 (6.9%)
 Alcoholic cirrhosis: 84 (48.3%)
 Other causes: 52 (29.9%)
 Average follow‐up period in months (for all groups): 6
 Additional treatment such as antiviral drugs: none stated
 Important inclusion and exclusion criteria 
 Primary transplantation only: yes
 Retransplantation only: no
 HCV only: no
 HBV only: no
 Alcoholic cirrhosis only: no
 Other causes: yes
Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups.
 Group 1: cyclosporine A plus glucocorticosteroids (n = 90).
 Further details: cyclosporine A: attain 150 to 300 ng/mL; glucocorticosteroids: prednisolone 20 mg/day.
 Group 2: cyclosporine A (n = 84).
 Further details: cyclosporine A: attain 150 to 300 ng/mL.
Outcomes The outcomes reported were:
  • mortality,

  • adverse events,

  • graft rejection.

Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: there were no postrandomisation dropouts.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: no published protocol was available; mortality/graft loss and adverse events were reported.
For‐profit bias High risk Quote: "supported by a grant from Novartis Pharma"
Other bias High risk Comment: despite following participants for 12 months, the authors present only the 6‐month results and have excluded 2 late deaths.