Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 16;2017(2):CD008435. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008435.pub3

1. Trials assessing pain during heel lance.

Study Design Participants Intervention Outcome Metrics Used Results
Castral 2008 Randomized
controlled trial
59 infants (31 intervention, 28 control)
Postmenstrual age, mean, days: 248.3 (intervention), 254.4 (control)
Birth weight, mean, grams: 1748.8 (intervention), 1846.2 (control)
Intervention: 15 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before, during and following heel lance
Control: standard care during heel lance
Provider: mother
Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS) and heart rate at baseline, treatment, heel cleaning, heel lance, heel squeezing, wound compression, and recovery Mean, mean difference (Treatment ‐control) Std. error, P value, 95% confidence intervals Statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups during puncture, heel squeeze and post phases of heel lance. Infants receiving skin‐to‐skin contact more likely than infant controls to have significantly lower NFCS scores for heel lance (P = 0.023) and for heel squeeze. Both groups showed increased heart rate during puncture and heel squeeze although changes in these measures were less for treated infants (average increase of 19 bpm from baseline to heel puncture and squeezing in treatment group compared to average increase value of 23 bpm during puncture and 34 bpm during heel squeezing in control group)
Means and standard deviations for NFCS scores and cry duration were obtained from the author
Cong 2009 Randomized cross‐over 14 infants (13 intervention, 10 control)
Postnatal age, mean ± SD, days: 6 ± 1 (total)
Postmenstural age, range, weeks:30‐32
Birth weight, mean ± SD, grams: 1775 ± 292 (total)
Weight on day of study, mean ± SD, grams: 1706 ± 293 (total)
Intervention: 60 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before, during and following heel lance
Control: standard care during heel lance
Provider: mother
Heart rate, low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) power, LF/HF power, and state at baseline, heel warming, heel lance, and recovery Not reported HR significantly lower in the KC condition (146 ± 9 bpm) than in IC (152 ± 13 bpm) during BL period (P < 0.05) and HS period (KC 159 ± bpm versus IC 165 ± 14 bpm, P < 0.05). HR increased significantly during HS from the BL and HW periods in both KC (P < 0.05) and IC conditions (P < 0.001), and returned to BL values during RC in both conditions. LF was higher in KC at BL (P < 0.01) and HS (P < 0.001) and HF was higher in KC at BL than in IC condition (P < 0.05). LF/HF ratio fluctuated less across periods in KC than in IC condition and was significantly lower during RC in KC than in IC (P < 0.001). LF and HF increased during HS from BL and HW, and dropped in the RC period in both KC (LF, P < 0.05 and HF, P < 0.01) and IC (LF, P < 0.01 and HF, P < 0.001) conditions. The LF/HF ratio was lower during HS than during BL, HW, and RC in both KC (P < 0.01) and IC (P < 0.001) conditions
Cong 2011 Prospective randomized cross‐over 28 infants: 14 infants ‐ 80 min SSC (Study 1); 10 infants ‐ 30 min SSC (Study 2)
Postnatal age, mean ± SD, days: 5 ± 1 (Study 1); 6 ± 2 (Study 2)
Postmenstrual age, range, weeks: 30‐32
Birth weight, mean ± SD, grams: 1779 ± 277 (Study 1); 1577 ± 327 (Study 2)
Intervention:
(a) Study 1: 60 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before heel lance, with continued SSC during procedure, and followed by 20 minutes SSC post‐procedure;
(b) Study 2: 10 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before heel lance, with continued SSC during procedure, and followed by 20 minutes SSC post‐heel lance
Control: standard care during heel lance
Provider: mother
PIPP score, salivary and serum cortisol at baseline, heel warming, heel lance and recovery Mean, standard deviations Study 2 showed lower PIPP scores at four time points during recovery (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), lower salivary cortisol at the end of recovery (P < 0.05) and lower serum cortisol during heel lance for the kangaroo care heel lance condition (KCH) (P < 0.05) as swell as clinically lower PIPP scores in the KCH condition during heel lance
Cong 2012 Randomized cross‐over 26 preterm infants (PMA 28 0/7 to 32 6/7 weeks): 22 infants ‐ 30 min SSC (Study a); 25 infants ‐ 15 min SSC (Study b); 23 infants control
Postnatal age, mean ± SD, days: 14.5 ± 6.3 (Study a); 13.8 ± 5.6 (Study b); 13.5 ± 5.6 (control)
Birth weight, mean ± SD, grams: 1444.6 ± 379.0
Intervention:
(a) Study a: 30 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before and throughout heel lance
(b) Study b: 15 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before and throughout heel lance
Control: standard care during heel lance
Provider: mother
Heart rate, heart rate variability (low frequency and high frequency power), LF/HF ratio, Infant behavioural state Mean, standard deviations HR changes from baseline to heel stick were significantly less in KC30 and KC15 than in IC, and more infants had HR decrease in IC than in 2 KC conditions. In IC, LF and HF significantly increased from baseline to heel stick and dropped from heel stick to recovery; in 2 KC conditions, no changes across study phases were found. During heel stick, LF and HF were significantly higher in IC than in KC30. In all 3 conditions, LF/HF ratio decreased from baseline to heel stick and increased to recovery; no differences were found between IC and two KC conditions. Both longer and shorter KC before and throughout heel stick can stabilize HR response in preterm infants, and longer KC significantly affected infants’ sympathetic and parasympathetic responses during heel stick compared with incubator care
Freire 2008 Randomized controlled trial 95 infants (31 intervention, 33 control, 31 comparison)
Postmenstrual age, range, weeks: 28‐36
Intervention: 10 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before, during heel lance
Control: standard care during heel lance
Comparison: Sweet taste 2 minutes before heel lance
Provider: mother
PIPP score Mean, standard deviations Heart rate variation and oxygen saturation significantly lower in kangaroo group compared to incubator and glucose groups (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0012, respectively). Shorter duration of facial activity (brow bulge, eye squeeze and nasolabial furrowing) (P = 0.0001) and significantly lower PIPP score (P = 0.0001) observed in the kangaroo care method group
Means and standard deviations for PIPP scores were obtained from the author
Gabriel 2013 Randomized controlled trial 136 infants (127 in analysis)(33/31 skin‐to‐skin, 33/32 sucrose, 35/35 sucrose + ssc, 35/29 skin‐to‐skin + breastfeeding)
Gestational age, range, median, weeks: skin‐to‐skin: 37 to 41, 39; sucrose: 37 to 41, 39; sucrose + skin‐to‐skin: 37 to 41, 40; sucrose + breastfeeding: 37 to 42, 40
Birth weight, range, mean, grams: skin‐to‐skin: 2832 to 3900, 3359; sucrose: 1945 to 4176, 3215; sucrose + skin‐to‐skin: 2340 to 4108, 3349; sucrose + breastfeeding: 2266 to 4338, 3289
Group 1: 5 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before, during heel lance.
Group 2: 2 mL of 24% sucrose 2 minutes before heel lance
Group 3: 5 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before, during heel lance + 2 mL of 24% sucrose 2 minutes before heel lance
Group 4: 5 minutes of breastfeeding with skin‐to‐skin before, during heel lance.
Provider: skin‐to‐skin care and breastfeeding provided by the mother. Sucrose administered by a nurse.
Crying time, % of crying in blood sampling, heart rate, NIPS median and IQR (crying time, % of crying during blood sample, NIPS), mean and standard deviations (heart rate). Breastfeeding + skin‐to‐skin group lower median NIPS score during heel stick (P < 0.01). NIPS scores in sucrose + skin‐to‐skin group lower than sucrose alone group 2 minutes after procedure (P = 0.02). Percentage of neonates with moderate‐to‐severe pain lowest in breastfeeding + skin‐to‐skin group, breastfeeding + skin‐to‐skin and sucrose + skin‐to‐skin had lower percentage of crying time compared to skin‐to‐skin alone.
Gao 2015 Randomized controlled trial 80 infants (75 in analysis) (40/38 in skin‐to‐skin, 40/37 in control)
Gestational age, range, weeks: 27 to 37
Postnatal age, mean ± SD, days (heel stick 1,2,3,4):
Skin‐to‐skin: 3.5 ± 0.3,4.3 ± 0.8,5.3 ± 0.6,6.7 ± 0.8
Control: 3.6 ± 0.4,4.2 ± 0.8,5.2 ± 0.7,6.8 ± 0.8
Birth weight, mean ± SD, grams: Intervention: 2017.8 ± 154.7; Control: 2030 ± 135.6
Intervention: Prone in incubator for 1 heel lance, Skin‐to‐skin 30 minutes pre‐heel lance for three consecutive procedures.
Control: prone in incubator × 4 heel lances
Provider: mother
Crying time(seconds), grimacing time (seconds), heart rate mean, standard deviations Between group:
Crying (P < 0.001), Grimacing (P < 0.001), HR (P < 0.001) significantly lower in skin‐to‐skin group.
Within group:
No loss in efficacy of skin‐to‐skin over time
Gray 2000 Randomized controlled trial 30 infants (15 control, 15 intervention)
Postnatal age, range, hours: 33 to 55
Postmenstrual age, weeks: ≥ 37
Birth weight, mean (range), grams: 3300 (2600 to 3700)
Intervention: 10 to 15 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before heel lance
Control: standard care during heel lance
Provider: mother
Heart rate during blood collection, cry duration and grimacing during recovery period Mean Infants held by mother in skin‐to‐skin contact, cried and grimaced for an average of 1 and 2 seconds, respectively, for entire recovery period. Control infants cried for a mean of 32 seconds and grimaced for a mean of 30 seconds of the 3‐minute recovery period (P < 0.001). Heart rate of skin‐to‐skin infants increased by about 8 to 10 bpm during blood collection whereas control infants heart rate rose by 36 to 38 bpm to an asymptote of 160bpm
Johnston 2003 Randomized cross‐over 74 infants
Postnatal age, range, days: 0 to 10
Postmenstrual age, mean ± SD (range), weeks: 33.7 ± 1.1 (32.0 to 36.0)
Birth weight, mean ± SD (range), grams: 2054 ± 406 (1320 to 3125)
Intervention: 30 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before and during heel lance
Control: standard care during heel lance
Provider: mother
PIPP score at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes Mean, 95% confidence
interval
Significantly lower PIPP scores in KC condition at 30 seconds (difference, 1.5 points; P = 0.04), 60 seconds (difference, 2.2 points; P = 0.002), and 90 seconds (difference, 0.6 point; P = 0.37) after heel‐lancing procedure. Heart rate and oxygen saturation similar in both conditions. Facial actions contributed significantly to total pain score (0.0 < P < 0.005), with facial actions averaging 20% greater in control versus KC condition
Means and standard deviations for heart rate were obtained from the author
Johnston 2008 Randomized cross‐over 61 infants
Postmenstrual age, mean ± SD, weeks: 30.5 ± 1
Birth weight, mean ± SD, grams: 1421 ± 490
Intervention: 15 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before and during heel lance
Comparison: swaddling in incubator 15 minutes before heel lance
Provider: mother
PIPP score at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes
Time to return to baseline
Heart rate
Mean Mean PIPP scores not significantly lower in KMC condition 30 and 60 seconds post‐heel lance Significant difference by 90 seconds post‐heel lance (KMC 8.871 (95% CI 7.85 to 9.89) versus Incubator 10.677 (95% CI 9.56to 11.79) P < 0.001). Insignificant difference continued to 120 seconds (8.86 (95% CI 7.48 to 10.26) versus 10.21 (95% CI 9.03to 11.39) P = 0.145). Significant difference in time returning to baseline heart rate at end of blood sampling (123 seconds (95% CI 103 to 142) for the KMC and 193 seconds for incubator (95% CI 158 to 227) (F (61,1) = 13.6, P < 0.0000). Facial actions significantly lower in KMC than incubator throughout phases. Maximum heart rate significantly lower at 30, 60 and 90 seconds. Minimum oxygen saturation levels significantly higher at 60 and 90 seconds
Means and standard deviations for PIPP scores were obtained from the author
Johnston 2009 Randomized cross‐over 90 infants
Postnatal age, range, days: 1 to 14
Postmenstrual age, mean ± SD, weeks: 33.4 ± 1.1
Birth weight, mean ± SD, grams: 1968 ± 388
Intervention: 30 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before and during heel lance
Comparison: 30 minutes of enhanced skin‐to‐skin care (rocking, singing/talking to baby, offering finger/pacifier for baby to suck
Provider: mother
PIPP score at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes Mean Mean PIPP scores not significantly different between conditions for any of the 30 s blocks of time. No difference in condition for examining time for heart rate to return to baseline
Means and standard deviations for PIPP scores were obtained from the author
Johnston 2011 Randomized cross‐over 62 preterm infants (PMA 28 to 36 weeks)
Postnatal age, mean, days: 5 to 10
Birth weight, mean ± SD, grams: 1565 ± 469 (father KC/mother KC); 1610 ± 494 (mother KC/father KC)
Intervention: 30 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before and during heel lance provided by mother
Comparison: 30 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before and during heel lance provided by father
Provider: mother or father
PIPP score at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, time for HR to return to baseline Mean difference, 95% confidence interval Infants in maternal KC displayed significantly lower scores on the PIPP at 30 and 60 seconds after the heel lance than when in paternal KC (30 seconds mean difference 1.44 (95% CI 0.23 to 2.63); 60 seconds mean difference 1.55 (95% CI, 0.07 to 3.03). No differences at 90 and 120 seconds.
The difference in time to return to KC heart rate before the heel lance was significant, with the time in maternal KC being 204 seconds and in paternal KC, 246 seconds (mean difference, 42 seconds (95% CI 5.16 to 81.06 seconds).
Johnston 2012 Randomized cross‐over 18 preterm infants (PMA 28 to 36 completed weeks)
Postnatal age, range, days: within 10 days
Birth weight, mean, grams: 2200
Intervention: 30 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before and during heel stick provided by the mother
Comparison: 30 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before and during heel lance provided by an unrelated woman
Provider: mother or an unrelated woman
PIPP score at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes Estimate of effect size (based Cohen’s formula, based on mean differences divided by the standard deviation) The effect sizes on the pain scores (PIPP) were small, ranging from 1.1 to 1.7. The effect size at 30 sec was 0.23, at 60 sec was 0.24, at 90 sec was 0.43 and at 120 sec was 0.37
There was a 48% participation rate, with only 40 of 82 eligible cases having maternal consent. The main reason for refusal was discomfort with another woman providing kangaroo care
Kostandy 2008 Randomized cross‐over 10 infants
Postmenstrual age, range, weeks: 30 to 32
Birth weight, mean ± SD, grams: 1577 ± 327.00
Intervention: 30 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before and during heel lance
Control: standard care during heel lance
Provider: mother
Cry duration at baseline, warming, heel lance, and recovery Mean, standard deviation Significant difference in crying time between study phases on both days (F (1,8) = 10.25, P < 0.001). When in KC as compared to the incubator, crying time was less during the heel lance (P = 0.001) and recovery (P = 0.01) phases
Liu 2015 Randomized controlled trial 40 infants
Gestational age, mean ± SD, weeks: Intervention: 39.3 ± 0.94; Control: 39.36 ± 0.63
Birth weight, mean ± SD, grams: Intervention: 3337g ± 409.1; Control: 3740g ± 298.9
Intervention: Skin‐to‐skin care 15 minutes pre, during, and one minute after heel lance
Control: Post bath, swaddled during and 1 min after heel lance.
Provider: mother
DAN score, crying time, pain facial expression duration, SpO2, HR Mean, standard deviations Decreased heart rate (P < 0.01), pain facial expression time (P = 0.041), crying time (P = 0.033), and DAN score (P < 0.01); increased oxygen saturation (P < 0.05) in skin‐to‐skin group.
Ludington‐Hoe 2005 Randomized cross‐over 23 preterm infants (< 37 weeks PMA)
Postnatal age, mean ± SD, days: 22 ± 11.4
Postmenstrual age, mean ± SD, weeks: 31.4 ± 2.7
Intervention: 3 hours of skin‐to‐skin care before and during heel lance
Control: standard care during heel lance
Provider: mother
Heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, cry duration, behavioural state Mean, standard deviation Heart rate and length of crying in response to pain significantly reduced during KC and the KC heel lance as compared to when infants were in the warmer and had a heel lance in the warmer. Significant main effects were found for heart rate (F(1,32) = 3.54, P = 0.042) and cry length (F(1,32) = 5.20; P = 0.01). Mean rise in heart rate from baseline to heel lance was less in the KC condition than in the warmer condition (F(1, 32) = 3.01, P = 0.047). Crying length during KC heel lance significantly less than during warmer heel lance (F(1,32) = 7.38, P = 0.003) and post‐lance period (P = 0.02)
Mosayebi 2014 Randomized Crossover 64 preterm infants (GA range, mean, weeks ± SD = 30 to 36, 33 ± 1.95)
Postnatal age, range, mean ± SD, days: 3 to 14, 7.28 ± 3.65
Birth weight range, mean ± SD: 1000 to 3500, 2095.85 ± 672.27
Intervention: 15 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before, during, and two‐minutes post heel lance
Control: 15 minutes prone and swaddled in an incubator before heel lance
Provider: mother
PIPP mean, standard deviations Mean score during and two minutes after intervention lower in skin‐to‐skin condition (P < 0.0)
Nimbalkar 2013 Randomized cross‐over 47 preterm infants (PMA 32 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks)
Postnatal age, mean, days: within 10 days
Birth weight, mean, grams: 1730 (intervention), unclear (control)
Intervention: 15 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before, during, and 15 minutes after heel lance
Control: standard care during heel lance
Provider: mother
PIPP score Mean, standard deviation Heart rate, behaviour and facial scores were statistically significant and lower in KMC group. But there was no statistically significant difference in oxygen saturation (SpO₂). The difference (4.85) in PIPP score was clinically and statistically significant (P < 0.001)
Okan 2010 Prospective randomized
controlled trial
107 infants (35 treatment, 36 control, 36 comparison)
Postnatal age, mean ± SD, days: 33.1± 5
Postmenstrual age, mean ± SD, days: 39.5 ± 0.6
Intervention: 15 min of skin‐to‐skin care before and during heel lance
Control: standard care during heel lance
Comparison: skin‐to‐skin care and breastfeeding before and during heel lance
Provider: mother
Crying time after painful stimulus
Change in heart rate
Change in SaO₂
NFCS
Median, 25% to 75% IQR Heart rate, oxygen saturation changes and length of crying were significantly reduced in treatment and comparison groups compared with control (P < 0.001). No difference found between treatment and comparison group
Length of crying ‐ Intervention: 65 (50 to 133); Control: 184 (107 to 281); Comparison: 48 (40 to 98)
Means and standard deviations for NFCS scores, heart rate and oxygen saturation were obtained from the author

units: heart rate – beats/minute (bpm); crying time – seconds; postmensrutal age (PMA); Douleur Aigue Neonatal (DAN);Neonatal Facial Coding Scale (NFCS); Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP)