Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 16;2017(2):CD008435. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008435.pub3

Johnston 2003.

Methods Randomized cross over trial
Participants 74 infants (32 to 36 weeks PMA)
Postnatal age, range, days: 0 to 10
Birth weight, mean ± SD (range), grams: 2054 ± 406 (1320‐3125)
Painful procedure: heel lance
Study period: 9 April 2001 to 28 June 2002
Interventions Intervention: 30 minutes of skin‐to‐skin care before and during heel stick
Control: standard care during painful procedure
Provider: mother
Outcomes PIPP score at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes
Secondary outcomes: heart rate and oxygen saturation
Notes Country: Canada
Power calculation: yes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Ordering of conditions was determined randomly by a computer‐generated program."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Off site computer generated program (information obtained from authors)
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "The camera was in close‐up focus on the neonate's face, with little surrounding area, no sound, and minimal colour, and turned 60 degrees in the KC condition so as to decrease the possibility of unblinding by research assistants who scored the tapes. Research assistants, who were blinded to the purpose of the study by being told that the study was about neonatal facial actions, coded facial actions in the laboratory of the principal investigator."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Data were provided for all 74 neonates included in the study
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Data were provided for all outcome measures listed in the methods section.
Other bias Low risk "There was a minimum of 24 hours and a maximum of 7 days between conditions, because the frequency of blood sampling was determined by clinical considerations."
Study is apparently free of other sources of bias