Summary of findings 6. Exposure to gonadotropins for subfertility compared to general population and endometrial cancer risk.
Patient or population: Women treated with ovary‐stimulating drugs for subfertility Intervention: Exposure to gonadotropins for subfertility Comparison: General population | ||||||
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | № of participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Risk with no treatment | Risk with exposure to gonadotropins for subfertility | |||||
Endometrial cancer | Study population | RR 2.12 (0.79 to 5.64) | 1595 (2 observational studies) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very low 1,2,3 | ||
542 per 100,000 | 1148 per 100,000 (428 to 3054) | |||||
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect |
1 Initial level of evidence was 'low' because of the study design (observational studies). 2Downgraded because of risk of bias and imprecision. 3 Optimal information size (OIS) not met.