Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;2017(3):CD011646. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011646.pub2

Summary of findings 11. Propylthiouracil compared with no intervention for alcohol‐related disorders (others).

Propylthiouracil compared with no intervention for alcohol‐related disorders (others)
Patient or population: alcohol‐related disorders (others)
Settings: secondary or tertiary care
Intervention: propylthiouracil
Comparison: no intervention
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (trials) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
No intervention Propylthiouracil
Mortality at maximal follow‐up
Follow‐up: 1 to 24 months
252 per 1000 132 per 1000
 (81 to 208) OR 0.45
 (0.26 to 0.78) 423 
 (2 trials) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2
Early mortality (mortality up to 90 days) None of the trials reported this outcome.
Serious adverse events (proportion) None of the trials reported this outcome.
Serious adverse events (number) None of the trials reported this outcome.
Health‐related quality of life None of the trials reported this outcome.
*The basis for the assumed risk is the mean control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Risk of bias: trial(s) were at high risk of bias (downgraded one level)

2Imprecision: small sample size (downgraded one level)

3Imprecision: Confidence intervals overlapped a clinically significant increase or reduction and clinically insignificant increase or reduction (downgraded one level).