Jacques 1995.
Methods | RCT of parallel group design. | |
Participants | 155 participants (men and women, 20 to 65 years old) were recruited and screened between December 1989 and September 1991 from two sources in Boston. Employees of a large manufacturing complex were recruited by work site posters and presentations, and Boston area residents were recruited by printed advertisements. Exclusion criteria: · Age ˂ 20 or > 65 years · Plasma ascorbic acid > 80 µmol/L for men or > 90 µmol/L for women · HDL cholesterol > 1.4 mmol/L for men or >1.7 mmol/L for women · Total cholesterol > 6.7 mmol/L · Body mass index > 31 kg/m2 for men or > 33 kg/m2 for women · Current smokers · History of diabetes, heart disease or liver disease · Vitamin C supplement use (> 60 mg/day) within the last 3 months · Use of lipid altering medication · On a weight modifying diet |
|
Interventions | Intervention (n = 80): 2 x 500 mg vitamin C tablets per day (one each morning and one each evening) for 8 months. Control (n = 75): 2 x placebo tablets per day (one each morning and one each evening) for 8 months. |
|
Outcomes | Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides. | |
Notes | Funding: commercial and non‐commercial (Hoffman‐La Roche and US Department of Agriculture). | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | States "double‐blind" but provide no further details. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Numbers lost to follow‐up provided, and reasons for exclusions provided. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported as specified. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to judge Non‐commercial and commercial funding. Authors did state that the content of the study does not necessarily represent the views of the US Department of Agriculture. |