Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 26;2017(1):CD009836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009836.pub2

Summary of findings 1. Summary of findings: occurrence of CIN and default rates.

Immediate colposcopy compared with cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities: occurrence of different grades CIN in histology according to follow‐up time and default rates
Patient or population: women with ASCUS or LSIL
Settings: colposcopy clinic
Intervention: immediate colposcopy
Comparison: cytological surveillance
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) No of participants
(studies) Quality of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Risk with cytological surveillance Risk with immediate colposcopy
Occurrence of CIN2+ in histology at 18 months 101 per 1000 151 per 1000
(113 to 203) RR 1.50 (1.12 to 2.01) 4028
(2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1  
Occurrence of CIN2+ in histology at 24 months 183 per 1000 209 per 1000
(121 to 361) RR 1.14 (0.66 to 1.97) 4331
(3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,3  
Occurrence of CIN3+ in histology at 18 months 69 per 1000 86 per 1000
(53 to 137) RR 1.24 (0.77 to 1.98) 4028
(2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate4  
Occurrence of CIN3+ in histology at 24 months 119 per 1000 121 per 1000
(63 to 234) RR 1.02 (0.53 to 1.97) 4331
(3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3,5  
Occurrence of any CIN in histology at 24 months 316 per 1000 639 per 1000
(420 to 974) RR 2.02 (1.33 to 3.08) 656
(2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3,8  
Default rates at 6 months 63 per 1000 241 per 1000
(80 to 728) RR 3.85
(1.27 to 11.63) 5117
(3 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate6
 
Default rates at 12 months 63 per 1000 413 per 1000
(93 to 1000) RR 6.60
(1.49 to 29.29 5115
(3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate7
 
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). For default rates the relative effect is calculated between cytological surveillance versus immediate colposcopy. For histology the relative effect is calculated between immediate colposcopy versus cytological surveillance.
ASCUS: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance CI: Confidence interval; CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; LSIL: low‐grade squamous intra‐epithelial lesions; RR: Risk Ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Downgraded to moderate due to substantial inter‐study heterogeneity (P = 0.08, I2= 61%).
2 Downgraded to low due to considerable inter‐study heterogeneity (P < 0.00001, I2= 94%).
3 Downgraded due to presence of the other possible bias resulting in falsely high CIN detection rate in the cytological surveillance arm.
4 Downgraded to moderate due to substantial inter‐study heterogeneity (P = 0.02, I2= 75%).
5 Downgraded to low due to considerable inter‐study heterogeneity (P < 0.00001, I2= 93%).
6 Downgraded to moderate due to considerable inter‐study heterogeneity (P = 0.02, I2= 76%).
7 Downgraded to moderate due to considerable inter‐study heterogeneity (P = 0.0004, I2= 87%).
8 Downgraded to low due to substantial inter‐study heterogeneity (P = 0.02, I2 = 82%).