Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 6;2017(3):CD009868. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009868.pub3

PILL 2011.

Methods Individual‐level RCT
Participants 378 participants (189 intervention; 189 comparator) from 7 countries (Australia, Brazil, India, Netherlands, New Zealand, UK, USA) with 5‐year Framingham coronary heart disease risk ≥ 7.5% or if Framingham risk was between 5% and 7.5%, two or more additional untreated risk factors were needed (body mass index > 30 kg/m2, waist circumference > 102 cm in men or > 88 cm in women; heart rate > 80 bpm; fasting glucose 5.6 mmol/L‐7 mmol/L, triglycerides > 1.7 mmol/L; family history of first degree relative with premature ischaemic heart disease or stroke (men < 55 years; women: < 65 years), or glomerular filtration rate < 60mL/min
Interventions Intervention: Red heart pill (aspirin 75 mg, lisinopril 10 mg, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg and simvastatin 20 mg)
Comparator: placebo
Outcomes Change in SBP; change in LDL‐C; tolerability; secondary outcomes included discontinuation, DBP, total cholesterol, HDL‐C, total cholesterol:HDL cholesterol ratio, non‐HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, frequency of switching/adding open‐label treatment, estimated effects on CVD risk
Notes Comparator: inactive/placebo
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Central computer‐based randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Central computer‐based randomisation
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Specifically reported and use of placebo control
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcome assessors and study staff all blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Low rates of loss to follow‐up (experimental 2%; control 1%); however, last observation carried forward method used for missing continuous data at week 12
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcomes outlined in methods paper were reported in the primary manuscript
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias are identifiable