Selection bias decisions for trials that reported unadjusted analyses: comparison of results obtained using method details alone with results using method details and trial baseline informationa |
Reported randomisation and allocation concealment methods |
Risk of bias judgement using methods reporting |
Information gained from study characteristics data |
Ris of bias using baseline information and methods reporting |
Unclear methods |
Unclear risk |
Baseline imbalances present for important prognostic variable(s) |
High risk |
Groups appear similar at baseline for all important prognostic variables |
Low risk |
Limited or no baseline details |
Unclear risk |
Would generate a truly random sample, with robust allocation concealment |
Low risk |
Baseline imbalances present for important prognostic variable(s) |
Unclear riskc |
Groups appear similar at baseline for all important prognostic variables |
Low risk |
Limited baseline details, showing balance in some important prognostic variablesb
|
Low risk |
No baseline details |
Unclear risk |
Sequence is not truly randomised, or allocation concealment is inadequate |
High risk |
Baseline imbalances present for important prognostic variable(s) |
High risk |
Groups appear similar at baseline for all important prognostic variables |
Low risk |
Limited baseline details, showing balance in some important prognostic variablesb
|
Unclear risk |
No baseline details |
High risk |
aTaken from Corbett 2014; judgements highlighted in bold indicate situations in which the addition of baseline assessments would change the judgement about risk of selection bias, compared with using methods reporting alone. bDetails for the remaining important prognostic variables are not reported. cImbalance identified that appears likely to be due to chance. |