Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;2017(3):CD001292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001292.pub3

Hennrikus 2010.

Methods Study design: Randomized controlled trial
Setting: 2 medical centres; USA
Recruitment: probable smokers with lower extremity PAD
Participants 687 current smokers with PAD; 15% women, av. age 60, av. cpd 18
Interventions Therapists: smoking cessation counsellor
1. Verbal advice to quit from vascular provider
2. Letter from vascular provider + intensive counselling, at least 6 sessions over 5 m, first in person then phone. Information about pharmacotherapies but not provided
Outcomes Abstinence at 6 m (PP)
Validation: saliva cotinine < 10 ng/ml, or CO < 8 ppm for people using NRT
Notes New for 2016 update
High use of pharmacotherapies in both groups; 87% in I, 67% in C
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "predetermined block randomization schedule stratified by medical center"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Biochemical validation of abstinence
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 25% I, 17% C lost at 6 m. 4 deaths (3I, 1C) excluded from MA denominators