Kim 2015.
Methods | Study design: Randomized controlled trial Setting: Korean community, USA Recruitment: Korean smokers wanting to quit |
|
Participants | 109 Korean smokers; 16% women, av. age 50, av. cpd 17 | |
Interventions | Therapist: 1 of 2 Korean bilingual clinicians 1. Culturally‐tailored counselling; 8 x 40‐min weekly sessions, TQD between 2nd and 4th 2. Minimal counselling; 8 x 10‐min weekly sessions focusing on medication management Pharmacotherapy: all participants received 8‐week supply of nicotine patch |
|
Outcomes | Abstinence at 6 m Validation: cotinine (Nicalert 1 < 10 ‐ 30 ng/ml), CO < 6 ppm |
|
Notes | New for 2016 update Contributes to comparison 2.1.2 more intensive vs less intensive counselling with pharmacotherapy Kim 2012 assumed to report a subset of these participants but unable to confirm with author |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated, stratified by gender |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Biochemical validation of abstinence |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 24% (13/55) I, 31% (17/54) C lost, included as smokers in analyses |