Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;2017(3):CD001292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001292.pub3

Kim 2015.

Methods Study design: Randomized controlled trial
Setting: Korean community, USA
Recruitment: Korean smokers wanting to quit
Participants 109 Korean smokers; 16% women, av. age 50, av. cpd 17
Interventions Therapist: 1 of 2 Korean bilingual clinicians
1. Culturally‐tailored counselling; 8 x 40‐min weekly sessions, TQD between 2nd and 4th
2. Minimal counselling; 8 x 10‐min weekly sessions focusing on medication management
Pharmacotherapy: all participants received 8‐week supply of nicotine patch
Outcomes Abstinence at 6 m
Validation: cotinine (Nicalert 1 < 10 ‐ 30 ng/ml), CO < 6 ppm
Notes New for 2016 update
Contributes to comparison 2.1.2 more intensive vs less intensive counselling with pharmacotherapy
Kim 2012 assumed to report a subset of these participants but unable to confirm with author
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated, stratified by gender
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Biochemical validation of abstinence
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 24% (13/55) I, 31% (17/54) C lost, included as smokers in analyses