Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;2017(3):CD001292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001292.pub3

Pedersen 2005.

Methods Study design: Randomized controlled trial
Setting: hospital, Denmark
 Recruitment: Inpatients with cardiac disease
Participants 105 smokers
 36% women, ˜70% aged > 50
Interventions Therapists: counsellors
1. Usual‐care control: in‐hospital advice to quit + information about NRT + NRT available
 2. Intervention: As 1, plus 5 x 30‐min post‐discharge contacts
Outcomes Abstinence at 12 m (PP)
 Validation: none
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomized, method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Sealed envelopes, but not stated to be numbered
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No validation of abstinence
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 10 (9.5%) lost to follow‐up, included in ITT analysis