Pedersen 2005.
Methods | Study design: Randomized controlled trial Setting: hospital, Denmark Recruitment: Inpatients with cardiac disease |
|
Participants | 105 smokers 36% women, ˜70% aged > 50 | |
Interventions | Therapists: counsellors 1. Usual‐care control: in‐hospital advice to quit + information about NRT + NRT available 2. Intervention: As 1, plus 5 x 30‐min post‐discharge contacts |
|
Outcomes | Abstinence at 12 m (PP) Validation: none | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomized, method not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Sealed envelopes, but not stated to be numbered |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No validation of abstinence |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 10 (9.5%) lost to follow‐up, included in ITT analysis |