4. Maternal age, reference standard and study design characteristics of included studies.
Study | Maternal age (years)* | Reference standard† | Withdrawals explained? | Study design |
Aagaard‐Tillery 2009 | 30.6 (SD 6.1) | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | Of 33,546 trial participants only 7842 women with complete information for all screening tests and genetic sonography were included in the study. | Prospective cohort |
Audibert 2001 | 30.1, all < 38, 86% < 35, 14% ≥35 | Prenatal karyotype conducted (in 7.6% of patients) depending on presence of risk >1/125, high maternal age, parental anxiety, history of chromosomal defects or parental translocation or abnormal second trimester scan. Cytogenetic testing of newborns with suspected abnormalities. Postmortum on terminations of pregnancy or miscarriages. Follow‐up to neonatal examination in newborns. | 35 women were lost to follow‐up (they had all had normal NT results). 340 women who did not want second trimester serum screening withdrew from that part of the study. Women lost to follow‐up were excluded in the final analysis. All detected cases were terminated. | Prospective consecutive series |
Babbur 2005 | Median 37 (range 19 to 46) | Invasive testing offered to women with NT > 3 mm or risk > 1:250 as defined by combined NT and serum results CVS from 11 weeks, amniocentesis from 15 weeks). Rapid in situ hybridisation test in patients with risk > 1:30. No details given of any follow‐up to birth | 463 patients having NT did not go on to have second trimester serum testing. Women with miscarriages excluded. | Prospective cohort |
Baviera 2010 | 35.3 for Down's cases, 30.4 for controls | Amniocentesis or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Case control |
Benattar 1999 | 32 (16 to 46), 8.3% > 35 | Amniocentesis due to maternal age > 38 years (6.1% or women). Karyotyping encouraged for women with positive result on one or more index test. No details of reference standard for index test negative women. | No details of withdrawals given. 12 patients were lost to follow‐up due to miscarriages | Prospective cohort |
Bestwick 2010 | Median 39 for Down's cases, 34 for non‐Down's cases | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Retrospective cohort |
Cuckle 2008 | Not reported | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Prospective cohort |
Goh 1996 | 33 | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Cohort |
Guanciali‐Franchi 2010 | 31.8 | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Prospective cohort |
Habayeb 2010 | Median 35.4 (range 18 to 49) | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Cohort |
Herman 2002 | Not reported | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Case control |
Lam 2002 | 30.5 (19% ≥35) (unaffected pregnancies) | Women considered high risk offered CVS (0.7%) or amniocentesis (11.8%). Follow‐up to birth | Details given for patients excluded and those without follow‐up data. | Prospective cohort |
Malone 2005 | 21.6% aged 35 and above | Amniocentesis (offered to women with positive results from any screening test) or follow‐up to birth. | Details given for patients who did not undergo different index tests. Unclear which patients did not have follow‐up data. Appears that aborted/miscarried foetuses did not have follow‐up. | Prospective cohort |
Okun 2008 Integrated | 32 | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | 2614 (8%) of women undergoing integrated screening did not return for the second trimester part of the test. | Prospective cohort |
Palomaki 2006 | 33.9 (SD 4.4) for Down's cases, 35.9 (SD 3.6) for controls | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Case control |
Rodrigues 2009 | 30.6 for integrated screening, 30.9 for serum integrated screening | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Retrospective cohort |
Rozenberg 2002 | 30.5 (18 to 37) | Amniocentesis offered to patients with NT > 3 mm or serum marker risk was > 1:250. Follow‐up to birth. | No details of withdrawals given. 3.4% of patients were lost to follow‐up and were excluded from the study. This included 113 women (1.2%) with miscarriages. | Prospective cohort |
Schuchter 2001 | 28 (range 15 to 46), 10.7% aged 35 and above | CVS (offered to patients with first trimester NT > 3.5 mm), amniocentesis (offered to patients with first trimester NT 2.5 to 3.4, high risk on second trimester serum testing (> 1:250) and those > 35 years) or follow‐up to birth. | No details of withdrawals given. Women having miscarriages were excluded from the study. | Retrospective cohort |
Wald 2003b | Not reported | Invasive testing (following second trimester screening) or follow‐up to birth. | No details of withdrawals given. | Case control |
Wald 2009 | Median 33 (range 15 to 51), 20% aged 37 and above | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Retrospective cohort |
Wright 2010 FASTER trial | Not reported | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Case control |
Wright 2010 North York | Not reported | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth | No details of withdrawals given. | Case control |
CVS = chorionic villus sampling; NT = nuchal translucency; SD = standard deviation
*Mean maternal age presented unless otherwise indicated.
†In all studies the choice of reference standard was dependent on the results of the index test.