Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012599. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012599

Bestwick 2010.

Clinical features and settings Routine screening
Participants 22,746 participants
UK ‐ 2 clinics
January 2003 ‐ December 2008
Pregnant women
Median maternal age 39 years (Down's syndrome) and 34 years (non‐Down's syndrome)
11‐13 and 14‐22 weeks' gestation
Study design Retrospective cohort
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 106 cases
Reference standards: karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
First trimester NT, PAPP‐A and free ßhCG (details not reported)
Second trimester AFP, uE3, free ßhCG and inhibin‐A (details not reported)  
Follow‐up Data obtained from the Hospitals, the regional cytogenetic unit and the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register
Aim of study To determine whether the SD of NT measurements has decreased over time and, if so, to revise the estimate and assess the effect of revising the estimate of the SD on the performance of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome
Test characteristics  
Reference standard used  
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Unclear Unclear if all women received a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests No No details of withdrawals given