Table 4.
R2 | partial r | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Model 1: Chao1 | 0.49 | ||
%HRmax | −0.53* | 0.003 | |
%Body fat | 0.01 | 0.96 | |
Menopausal status | −0.49* | 0.006 | |
Model 2: Observed species | 0.45 | ||
%HRmax | −0.55* | 0.001 | |
%Body fat | 0.15 | 0.43 | |
Menopausal status | −0.43* | 0.02 | |
Model 3: PD Whole Tree | 0.50 | ||
%HRmax | −0.59* | 0.001 | |
%Body fat | 0.12 | 0.53 | |
Menopausal status | −0.44* | 0.02 | |
Model 4: Shannon | 0.26 | ||
%HRmax | −0.34 | 0.07 | |
%Body fat | −0.03 | 0.89 | |
Menopausal status | −0.29 | 0.12 | |
Model 5: Simpson | 0.15 | ||
%HRmax | −0.20 | 0.30 | |
%Body fat | −0.07 | 0.70 | |
Menopausal status | −0.23 | 0.21 |
%HRmax, percent of age-predicted heart rate (HR) max derived (from 220-age) during stage 3 of the modified-Naughton protocol;
%body fat calculated from isotopic total body water; menopausal status, participants dichotomized by 0 (no) and 1 (yes) indicating whether they experienced menopause.
p ≤ 0.05.