Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 1;2017(2):CD011802. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011802.pub2

Comparison 2. ICS dose reduction versus no change in ICS dose (concomitant LABA).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Exacerbation requiring OCS 2 569 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.31 [0.82, 2.08]
2 Asthma control (short asthma morbidity score), change from baseline 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Asthma control (Asthma Severity Questionnaire) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 All‐cause SAEs 2 569 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.11, 3.33]
5 EuroQoL score (change from baseline) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 St. George's Respiratory Scale score (change from baseline) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
7 Lung function, PEFR morning (L/min) (change from baseline) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
8 Lung function, reduction in FEV1 (% predicted, change from baseline) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
9 Exacerbation requiring hospitalisation 2 569 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.06 [0.45, 36.86]
10 Exacerbation requiring ED visit 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
11 Mortality 1 310 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]