Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 28;2017(3):CD011650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011650.pub2

Aikata 2006.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomised clinical trial
Participants Country: Japan
Number randomised: 44
Postrandomisation dropouts: not stated
Revised sample size: 44
Average age: not stated
Females: not stated
Cirrhosis: not stated
Very early HCC: not stated
Portal hypertension: not stated
Viral aetiology: not stated
Immunotherapy/antiviral adjuvant therapy: not stated
Average follow‐up period in months (for all groups): not stated
Criteria for early or very early HCC and other inclusion criteria:
  • < 3 cm solitary hypervascular nodules

Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups:
Group 1: TACE plus radiofrequency ablation (n = 21).
Further details: cisplatinum TACE, internally cooled electrode (brand not stated) for radiofrequency ablation.
Group 2: Radiofrequency ablation (n = 23).
Further details: internally cooled electrode (brand not stated).
Outcomes The outcomes reported were:
  • mortality,

  • adverse events.

Notes Reasons for postrandomisation dropouts: not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: important clinical outcomes were reported.
For‐profit bias Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available.
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other bias noted.