Lee 2014.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised clinical trial | |
Participants | Country: South Korea Number randomised: 63 Postrandomisation dropouts: not stated Revised sample size: 63 Average age: not stated Females: not stated Cirrhosis: not stated Very early HCC: 0 (0%) Portal hypertension: not stated Viral aetiology: not stated Immunotherapy/antiviral adjuvant therapy: not stated Average follow‐up period in months (for all groups): not stated Criteria for early or very early HCC and other inclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups: Group 1: surgery (n = 29). Further details: not stated whether surgery was open or laparoscopic resection. Group 2: radiofrequency ablation (n = 34). Further details not available. | |
Outcomes | The outcomes reported were:
|
|
Notes | Reasons for postrandomisation dropouts: not stated | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: this information was not available. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: this information was not available. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: this information was not available. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: this information was not available. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: this information was not available. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: important clinical outcomes were reported. |
For‐profit bias | High risk | Comment: grant/research support: Green Cross, Chong Kun Dang Pharm, Novartis, SK Chemicals |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no other bias noted. |