Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD005037. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005037.pub2

Zimmermann 2005.

Methods Randomised placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial with 2 parallel arms
Recruitment period: unclear
Observation period: 2 weeks (for postoperative face swelling)
Ethical approval: yes
Participants Number of patients:
eligible: unclear ‐ included: unclear ‐ reported: 20
Drop outs: unclear
Inclusion criteria: female and male patients, age >18, with carcinoma of the tongue or floor of the mouth (clinical stage T3 or T4)
Exclusion criteria: clinical tumour stage T1 or T2; second malignancy; cardiac oedema; hypoproteinic oedema; acute infections during the past 6 months; regular intake of antioxidants; chronic renal failure; intellectual disability; pregnant women; prison inmates; participants of other clinical studies.
Demographics: 18 men ‐ 2 women; age 30 ‐ 74 (mean: 57) years; all patients had histologically confirmed squamous cell cancer (2 pT2, 7 pT3, 8 pT4)
Recruitment and setting: monocenter study, Dresden, Germany
Informed consent: yes
Interventions Intervention: 3000 µg sodium selenite solution i.v. on day of surgery; 1000 µg sodium selenite solution i.v. or p.o. on days 1 to 21 after surgery
Control: placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution)
all patients: surgical tumour resection in curative intention with bilateral neck dissection
Outcomes Primary outcome measures: three defined distances and circumferences in the face; selenium levels in whole blood and several other laboratory parameters
Assessment of outcome of interest: manual measurement by one investigator at four time points (prior to, immediately after, one week after and two weeks after surgical intervention)
Notes Intervention: concomitant surgical and non‐surgical interventions with influence on lymphoedema not reported
Investigators provided additional information on their interpretation of study results
All patients who refused the continuation of study medication due to perceived adverse effects would have been excluded from the final study report according to Leonhardt 2002; according to personal communication no drop‐outs occurred.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐Unclear

CRP: C‐reactive protein

d: day

Gy: Gray

µg: microgram

NSAID: non‐steroidal antiinflammatory drugs

p.o.: per os