Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 23;2016(8):CD002771. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002771.pub4

Eka Pratiwi 2009.

Methods Randomized controlled trial conducted in Bali, Indonesia
Participants Number of infants: 93
Inclusion criteria: infants with birthweight between 1500 and 2250 g, with Apgar score > 6 at 5 minutes, and mother willing to follow study instructions
Exclusion criteria: infants with major congenital malformations, cardiopulmonary problems, critical illness (sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, intracranial bleeding); twin gestation or complicated pregnancy and/or labor; mothers with history of drug abuse, psychiatric disorders, or cesarean section, or unable to take care of themselves or their babies
Infant stabilization status at trial entry: stabilized
Infant age and weight at trial entry: Mean birthweight at recruitment was 2034 ± 159 and 1988 ± 176 g for KMC and control infants, respectively. No data on infant age at recruitment. However, researchers mentioned that KMC was started "in the first day or in several hours after birth"
Interventions KMC group: Infants were kept in close SSC with the mother whilst in vertical position. Specially tailored kangaroo suits were used by mother‐infant pairs to enable SSC. Mean duration of KMC was 10.0 ± 1.8 hours per day (range, 5.3 to 13.5 hours) (n = 48)
Control group: Infants were kept in incubators or open cribs in warm rooms (n = 45)
Level of care: NICU of a public hospital
Human resources: doctors and nurses
Criteria for infant discharge from the hospital: unreported
Scheme for follow‐up of infants after discharge: unreported
Outcomes Hypothermia, birthweight regain, sepsis, mortality
Notes 37% of LBW infants met eligibility criteria
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding of participants: no/unfeasible; blinding of clinical staff: no/unfeasible
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Unblinded assessors
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk One infant (1%) lost to follow‐up; 4 (4.1%) excluded after randomization owing to sepsis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes stated in Methods section adequately reported or explained in Results
Other bias High risk Use of block randomization (block size of 6), which could make possible prediction of future assignments in an unblinded trial when assignments are revealed subsequent to recruitment of the person into the trial