Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 23;2016(8):CD002771. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002771.pub4

Ghavane 2012.

Methods Randomized controlled trial conducted in Hyderabad, India
Participants Number of infants: 140
Inclusion criteria: infants with birthweight < 1500 g, tolerating spoon feeds of 150 mL/kg/d, and hemodynamically stable (not receiving oxygen or respiratory support, no apnea for 72 hours, not receiving intravenous fluids)
Exclusion criteria: major malformations, refused consent
Infant stabilization status at trial entry: stabilized
Infant age and weight at trial entry: Mean age at recruitment was 14.1 ± 10.3 and 13.7 ± 10.2 days, and mean weight was 1191 ± 131 and 1223 ± 125 g, for KMC and control infants, respectively
Interventions KMC group: Infants were kept in SSC, between the mother's breasts, in an upright position, dressed with a cap, socks, and diaper, and supported at the bottom with a cloth sling/binder, for ≥ 8 hours per day. When not receiving KMC, infants were placed in open cribs (n = 71)
Control group: Infants were kept in a warmer or incubator. Mothers were allowed to visit their babies and were encouraged to perform infant care activities such as diaper change, oil massage, and paladai feeding (n = 69)
Level of care: "kangaroo ward" (KMC infants) and neonatal intermediate care unit (controls) at a level III tertiary care hospital
Human resources: Infants in KMC group were cared for solely by their mothers, assisted by a trained nurse. Infants in control group were cared for by doctors and nurses
Criteria for infant discharge from the hospital: (1) For infants in KMC group: weight ≥ 1300 g or weight gain ≥ 10 g/d on 3 consecutive days if weight at randomization was > 1300 g. (2) For infants in control group: weight ≥ 1300 g, weight gain ≥ 10 g/d on 3 consecutive days, and skin temperature of 36°C to 37°C in the servo mode of the incubator with heater output < 25%
Scheme for follow‐up of infants after discharge: weekly until 40 weeks' postmenstrual age
Outcomes At 40 weeks' postmenstrual age: infant growth
At discharge: breastfeeding, sepsis, hypothermia, apnea, hypoglycemia, length of hospital stay, mortality
Notes No data on percentage of LBW infants who met eligibility criteria. Additional data provided by Dr Srinivas Murki
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Web‐based random number generator
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Numbered sealed opaque envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding of participants: no/unfeasible; blinding of clinical staff: no/unfeasible
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Physician who assessed growth outcomes was blinded to infants' intervention group
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 4 infants (2.9%) lost to follow‐up (KMC 3, control 1); no exclusions
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes stated in Methods section adequately reported or explained in Results
Other bias Low risk Other biases not identified