Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 16;2016(1):CD004920. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004920.pub3

Slotman 1987.

Methods Monocentre, randomized, parallel‐group study
Duration of the study: not reported
 Patients excluded/patients randomized: 17/74 (23%)
Sample size calculation/method description: No/No
Participants Patients randomized: 74
Age (mean): 65 years (treatment group), 59 years (placebo group)
Sex: not reported
Inclusion criteria: adult patients without fungal colonization and with three or more risk factors for fungal infection (age greater than 40 years, second‐ and third‐degree burns covering greater than 30% of body surface area, antibiotics greater than seven days, three or more antibiotics, severe sepsis unresponsive to antibiotics, diabetes, steroids greater than seven days, acute renal failure, immunosuppressive therapy or chemotherapy, advanced malignancy, total parenteral nutrition, multi trauma, serum glucose greater than 11.1 mmol/L, intra‐abdominal abscess, peritonitis, or severe head injury)
Exclusion criteria: pregnant patients, patients with sensitivity to ketoconazole, or any of the imidazole derivatives, patients with a previous or current history of hepatic cirrhosis, or acute hepatic failure
 Percentage post‐surgical: 97%
 Percentage colonized with Candida at baseline: 20%
Interventions 1. Ketoconazole 200 mg/day orally (n = 27)
 2. Placebo (n = 30)
Duration of the intervention: until ICU discharge
Outcomes Mortality
 Proven IFI
 Proven IFI with azole‐resistant Candida species
 Fungal colonization
 Fungal colonization with azole‐resistant Candida species
Follow‐up duration: until ICU discharge
Type of antifungal treatment Prophylaxis
Funding sources Quote: "Grant Support by Janssen Pharmaceutica, New Brunswick, NJ."
Declaration of interest among the primary researchers Not reported
Notes Country: USA
 Setting: single hospital, adult surgical ICU
Other: Patients colonized with Candida at baseline excluded from the analysis
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to make a judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to make a judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to make a judgement
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to make a judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Randomized patients who were found subsequently to have been colonized with fungi within 24 hours of entry into the study were considered precolonized and were excluded retrospectively"
Comment: prespecified reason for excluding patients from the analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The study protocol was not available but it was clear that published report included all expected outcomes
Other bias Low risk Comment: the study appears to be free of other sources of bias