Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600

Cowans 2010.

Clinical features and settings Routine screening  
Participants 445 participants: 70 cases and 375 controls matched for storage time and gestational age
January 2007 ‐ October 2008
UK
Pregnant women
Singleton pregnancies
Mean maternal age cases 37.0 years (IQR 32.9 to 40.5 years) and controls 32.4 years (IQR 29.0 to 35.9 years)
11‐13 weeks' gestation
Study design Case‐control study
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 70 cases
Reference standards: karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
First trimester NT (FMF certified sonographers)
Fresh serum samples tested for:
First trimester PAPP‐A and free ßhCG (Kryptor analyser, Brahms)
Frozen serum samples tested for:
First trimester placental growth factor (Solid‐phase, 2‐site fluoroimmunometric research assay (4083‐0010) on 6000 DELFIA Xpress random access platform, PerkinElmer)
Follow‐up Karyotype and results for pregnancy outcome received from cytogenetics laboratories and maternity units where deliveries took place
Aim of study To examine placental growth factor levels in first trimester maternal serum in trisomy 21 pregnancies and to investigate the potential value of PIGF in a first trimester screening test
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All women received a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of some index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Unclear Unclear if all index tests interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests No No details of withdrawals given