Gasiorek‐Wiens 2001.
Clinical features and settings | Routine screening | |
Participants | 21,959 participants Germany, Switzerland and Austria ‐ multicentre study June 1995‐May 2000 Pregnant women Median age 33 years (15‐49 years), 36.1% > 35 years Singleton pregnancies 10‐14 weeks' gestation |
|
Study design | Prospective cohort | |
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Down's syndrome: 210 cases Reference standards: CVS, amniocentesis or follow‐up to birth |
|
Index and comparator tests | Maternal age NT (FMF methods) Risk cut‐points of 1:100 and 1:300 |
|
Follow‐up | Follow‐up in 92.2% of women. Loss to follow‐up was due to miscarriage (n = 258), termination of pregnancy (n = 125) or absence of antenatal karyotyping (n = 1463). Only those with follow‐up information included in the study | |
Aim of study | To examine the effectiveness of screening for Down's syndrome using age and NT at 10‐14 weeks of gestation | |
Notes | ||
Table of Methodological Quality | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
Representative spectrum? All tests | Yes | Routine screening of typical pregnant population |
Acceptable reference standard? All tests | Yes | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth |
Partial verification avoided? All tests | Yes | All women received a reference standard |
Differential verification avoided? All tests | No | Choice of reference standard depended on index test results |
Incorporation avoided? All tests | Yes | Reference standard was independent of the index test |
Reference standard results blinded? All tests | No | Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results |
Index test results blinded? All tests | Yes | Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results |
Relevant clinical information? All tests | Yes | Information available as would be in standard clinical practice |
Uninterpretable results reported? All tests | Yes | Reported that NT successfully measured in all cases |
Withdrawals explained? All tests | No | No details of withdrawals given |