Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600

Gasiorek‐Wiens 2001.

Clinical features and settings Routine screening
Participants 21,959 participants
Germany, Switzerland and Austria ‐ multicentre study
June 1995‐May 2000
Pregnant women
Median age 33 years (15‐49 years), 36.1% > 35 years
Singleton pregnancies
10‐14 weeks' gestation
Study design Prospective cohort
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 210 cases
Reference standards: CVS, amniocentesis or follow‐up to birth
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
NT (FMF methods)
Risk cut‐points of 1:100 and 1:300
Follow‐up Follow‐up in 92.2% of women. Loss to follow‐up was due to miscarriage (n = 258), termination of pregnancy (n = 125) or absence of antenatal karyotyping (n = 1463). Only those with follow‐up information included in the study
Aim of study To examine the effectiveness of screening for Down's syndrome using age and NT at 10‐14 weeks of gestation
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population 
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All women received a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests Yes Reported that NT successfully measured in all cases
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests No No details of withdrawals given