Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600

Gasiorek‐Wiens 2010.

Clinical features and settings Routine screening
Participants 4097 participants with complete data on pregnancy outcome
Germany ‐ single examiner
December 1997 ‐ November 2006
Pregnant women
Singleton pregnancies
Median age 35.1 years (range 13.2‐46.7 years)
11‐13 weeks' gestation
Study design Cohort study
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 34 cases
Reference standards: Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
First trimester NT (FMF methods)
Mixture model, Delta NT and multiple of the median methods
Follow‐up Patient history and ultrasound results were entered into a database and pregnancy outcome or chromosomal results added as they became available
74 (1.8%) of women were excluded from the study because of incomplete follow‐up information
Aim of study To validate the mixture model in a single operator dataset and to compare the detection rates for fetal chromosomal defects obtained from the mixture model with those obtained from either the delta NT or log multiple of the median approach
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All women received a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests No No details of withdrawals given