Gasiorek‐Wiens 2010.
Clinical features and settings | Routine screening | |
Participants | 4097 participants with complete data on pregnancy outcome Germany ‐ single examiner December 1997 ‐ November 2006 Pregnant women Singleton pregnancies Median age 35.1 years (range 13.2‐46.7 years) 11‐13 weeks' gestation |
|
Study design | Cohort study | |
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Down's syndrome: 34 cases Reference standards: Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth |
|
Index and comparator tests | Maternal age First trimester NT (FMF methods) Mixture model, Delta NT and multiple of the median methods |
|
Follow‐up | Patient history and ultrasound results were entered into a database and pregnancy outcome or chromosomal results added as they became available 74 (1.8%) of women were excluded from the study because of incomplete follow‐up information |
|
Aim of study | To validate the mixture model in a single operator dataset and to compare the detection rates for fetal chromosomal defects obtained from the mixture model with those obtained from either the delta NT or log multiple of the median approach | |
Notes | ||
Table of Methodological Quality | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
Representative spectrum? All tests | Yes | Routine screening of typical pregnant population |
Acceptable reference standard? All tests | Yes | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth |
Partial verification avoided? All tests | Yes | All women received a reference standard |
Differential verification avoided? All tests | No | Choice of reference standard depended on index test results |
Incorporation avoided? All tests | Yes | Reference standard was independent of the index test |
Reference standard results blinded? All tests | No | Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results |
Index test results blinded? All tests | Yes | Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results |
Relevant clinical information? All tests | Yes | Information available as would be in standard clinical practice |
Uninterpretable results reported? All tests | No | No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements |
Withdrawals explained? All tests | No | No details of withdrawals given |