Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600

Kagan 2010.

Clinical features and settings Routine screening
Participants 56,954 participants with available outcome data  
UK ‐ multicentre  
July 1999 ‐ April 2007
Pregnant women
Singleton pregnancies
Mean maternal age 35.4 years (range 14.1 to 52.2 years)
11‐13 weeks' gestation
Study design Prospective cohort
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 395 cases
Reference standards: karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
First trimester NT
First trimester fetal heart rate (pulsed‐wave Doppler)
First trimester nasal bone (FMF certified sonographers)
First trimester ductus venous flow (FMF certified sonographers)
First trimester flow across tricuspid valve (FMF certified sonographers)
First trimester PAPP‐A and free ßhCG (Kryptor, Brahms AG or Delfia Express, Perkin Elmer) 
Multiple publications with different test evaluations
Follow‐up Karyotype results and details of pregnancy outcome added to databases as they became available. Women without complete screening and outcome data (n = 3053, 5.1%) were excluded from the study
Aim of study To examine the performance of first‐trimester screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, fetal heart rate and maternal serum free ßhCG and PAPP‐A
Other objectives in related publications
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All women received a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests No No details of withdrawals given