Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600

Koster 2011.

Clinical features and settings Routine screening
Participants 998 participants: 151 cases and 847 controls matched for gestational age, maternal weight, maternal age and storage time
The Netherlands ‐ National institute for Public Health and the Environment
2004 ‐ 2006
Pregnant women
Singleton pregnancies
Median maternal age 37 years (interquartile range 36‐39 years)
8‐13 weeks' gestation
Study design Case‐control study
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 151 cases
Reference standards: karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
First trimester NT
Fresh serum samples tested for:
First trimester free ßhCG and PAPP‐A (AutoDELFIA, PerkinElmer)
Frozen serum samples tested for:
First trimester ADAM 12s, total hCG, placental protein 13 (PP13) and placental growth factor (PlGF) (AutoDELFIA or DelfiaXpress, PerkinElmer)
Follow‐up Pregnancy outcome was recorded via questionnaires and self‐reporting by the participating women. Only samples for pregnancies with known outcome were selected as controls
Aim of study To evaluate the modelled predictive value of 3 current screening markers (PAPP‐A, free ßhCG and NT) and 4 potential screening markers (ADAM 12, total hCG, PP13 and PIGF) for Down's syndrome using different screening strategies
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All women received a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of some index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Unclear Unclear if all index tests interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests No No details of withdrawals given