Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600

Kozlowski 2007 GC.

Clinical features and settings Routine referral
Participants 6906 participants with complete outcome data
Germany ‐ gynaecologists practices
January 2000 ‐ December 2003
Pregnant women
Median maternal age 32 years (15‐48 years), 26.4% ≥ 35 years
11‐14 weeks' gestation
Study design Cohort study
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 19 cases in gynaecologists practices
Reference standard: karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
First trimester NT (FMF certified gynaecologists)
First trimester free ßhCG and PAPP‐A (Kryptor analyser, Brahms)
Risk cut‐point 1:300
Follow‐up Data on pregnancy outcome were obtained by contacting the patient or their general gynaecologist. Women without complete outcome data (36%) were excluded from the study
Aim of study To evaluate and compare the screening performance for fetal trisomy 21 in the first trimester of pregnancy in general gynaecologists practices and specialised centres for prenatal care in Germany
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All women received a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests Yes 146 women (including 11 with down's syndrome) excluded as results could not be assigned to gynaecologists' or prenatal centre group