Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600

Maiz 2009.

Clinical features and settings Routine screening
Participants 19,614 participants with complete screening and outcome data
UK ‐ multicentre
January 2006 ‐ May 2007
Pregnant women
Singleton pregnancies
Median maternal age 34.5 years (14.1‐50.1 years)
11‐13 weeks' gestation
Study design Prospective cohort
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 122 cases
Reference standards: karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
First trimester NT and fetal heart rate
First trimester ductus venous blood flow velocity waveforms (FMF certified sonographers)
First trimester PAPP‐A and free ßhCG (Delfia Xpress, PerkinElmer)
Follow‐up Karyotype results and details on pregnancy outcome were added to the database as soon as they became available. Women without complete outcome data (5.3%) were excluded from the study
Aim of study To investigate the performance of first trimester screening for aneuploidies by including assessment of ductus venosus flow in the combined test of maternal age, fetal NT thickness, fetal heart rate and serum free ßhCG and PAPP‐A  
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All women received a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests No No details of withdrawals given