Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600

Maymon 2005.

Clinical features and settings Routine screening
Participants 595 participants
Israel
January 1999 ‐ January 2004
Pregnant women
Mean age, healthy 30.3 years (SD 4.5), Down's syndrome 33.7 years (SD 4.9)
Singleton pregnancies
11‐14 weeks' gestation and second trimester screening
Study design Case‐control study
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 24 cases
Reference standards: amniocentesis (recommended for women with higher risk on first or second trimester testing) or follow‐up to birth
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
First trimester NT (11‐14 weeks)
First trimester PAPP‐A and free ßhCG (methods detailed in Maymon 2001) (some analysed retrospectively from banked samples)
Second trimester PAPP‐A and free ßhCG (methods detailed in Maymon 2001)
Follow‐up Delivery outcome obtained by telephone interview or medical records. Information was available for all uneventful pregnancies and delivery outcomes. It is unclear whether information on terminations of pregnancy or miscarriages was available.   
Aim of study To evaluate the cross‐trimester multiple marker correlation and the minimum marker combination needed for detecting various chromosomal aneuploides
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All women received a reference standard 
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice 
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements 
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests No No details of withdrawals given