Nicolaides 1992.
Clinical features and settings | High‐risk referral for invasive testing | |
Participants | 827 participants UK ‐ research centre for fetal medicine January 1990 ‐ October 1991 Pregnant women Median age 38 years (22‐47 years) 10‐14 weeks' gestation |
|
Study design | Prospective cohort | |
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Down's syndrome: 13 cases Reference standards: fetal karyotyping by amniocentesis (52%) or CVS (48%) |
|
Index and comparator tests | Maternal age First trimester NT (curvilinear 5MHz transducer, Aloka 650 CO Limited) |
|
Follow‐up | 100% karyotyping | |
Aim of study | To examine the significance of fetal NT at 10‐14 weeks' gestation in the prediction of abnormal fetal karyotype | |
Notes | ||
Table of Methodological Quality | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
Representative spectrum? All tests | Yes | Selective testing of high‐risk women as done in practice |
Acceptable reference standard? All tests | Yes | Amniocentesis or CVS |
Partial verification avoided? All tests | Yes | All women had a reference standard |
Differential verification avoided? All tests | No | Women had different reference standards |
Incorporation avoided? All tests | Yes | Reference standard was independent of the index test |
Reference standard results blinded? All tests | No | Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results |
Index test results blinded? All tests | Yes | Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results |
Relevant clinical information? All tests | Yes | Information available as would be in standard clinical practice |
Uninterpretable results reported? All tests | No | No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements |
Withdrawals explained? All tests | No | No details of withdrawals given |