Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600

Nicolaides 1992.

Clinical features and settings High‐risk referral for invasive testing
Participants 827 participants
UK ‐ research centre for fetal medicine
January 1990 ‐ October 1991
Pregnant women
Median age 38 years (22‐47 years)
10‐14 weeks' gestation
Study design Prospective cohort
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 13 cases
Reference standards: fetal karyotyping by amniocentesis (52%) or CVS (48%)
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
First trimester NT (curvilinear 5MHz transducer, Aloka 650 CO Limited)
Follow‐up 100% karyotyping
Aim of study To examine the significance of fetal NT at 10‐14 weeks' gestation in the prediction of abnormal fetal karyotype
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Selective testing of high‐risk women as done in practice 
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Amniocentesis or CVS
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Yes All women had a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Women had different reference standards
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice 
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements 
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests No No details of withdrawals given