Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600

Vadiveloo 2009.

Clinical features and settings Routine screening
Participants 10,189 participants
UK ‐ screening programme
July 2000 ‐ October 2005
Pregnant women
Median maternal age 33.1 years, 36.9% ≥ 35 years
9‐14 weeks' gestation
Study design Retrospective cohort
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 44 cases
Reference standards: karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
First trimester NT (trained sonographers)
First trimester PAPP‐A and free ßhCG (DELFIA fluoroimmunoassay, PerkinElmer LAS)
Contingent: biochemistry high risk cut‐off 1:42, low risk cut‐off 1:1000. If biochemical/maternal age risk between 1:42 and 1:1000, NT results added and combined risk calculated. Final cut‐point 1:250
Follow‐up Not reported  
Aim of study To assess the performance of a 2‐stage screening protocol for Down's syndrome based on initial serum marker analysis for all women and NT measurement only in women with intermediate risks
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Unclear Unclear if all women received a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests No No details of withdrawals given