Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;2017(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600

Valinen 2007.

Clinical features and settings Routine screening
Participants 7534 participants
Finland ‐ screening programme
2002‐2004
Pregnant women
Singleton pregnancies
Mean maternal age 29.6 years, 18.6% ≥ 35 years
10‐12 weeks' gestation
Study design Retrospective cohort
Target condition and reference standard(s) Down's syndrome: 30 cases (24 underwent NT as well as biochemical testing)
Reference standards: karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Index and comparator tests Maternal age
First trimester NT (trained nurses, midwives and doctors) (4765 women)
First trimester PAPP‐A and free ßhCG (details not reported) (all women)
Cut‐point 1:250
Follow‐up Contacted chromosome laboratory at the department of clinical genetics in the Oulu university clinic and the Finish Register of Congenital Malformation and the National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health  
Aim of study To compare the efficacy of both separate and combined maternal serum testing and fetal NT measurement in the first trimester screening for Down's syndrome in northern Finland
Notes  
Table of Methodological Quality
Item Authors' judgement Description
Representative spectrum? 
 All tests Yes Routine screening of typical pregnant population
Acceptable reference standard? 
 All tests Yes Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth
Partial verification avoided? 
 All tests Unclear Unclear if all women received a reference standard
Differential verification avoided? 
 All tests No Choice of reference standard depended on index test results
Incorporation avoided? 
 All tests Yes Reference standard was independent of the index test
Reference standard results blinded? 
 All tests No Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results
Index test results blinded? 
 All tests Yes Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results
Relevant clinical information? 
 All tests Yes Information available as would be in standard clinical practice
Uninterpretable results reported? 
 All tests No No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements
Withdrawals explained? 
 All tests No No details of withdrawals given